Visit www.wendyjelbert.co.uk or email art@wendyjelbert.co.uk
![]() Note by Sam Dauncey: The lighting was difficult, so both focus and colour rendition are a bit hit and miss. Sorry. Wendy displayed examples of her work and some items for sale, including books, cards and her famous "sword-liner" all-purpose brush. |
|
| She started the talk with a series of
general hints about painting moving things successfully. For
example: |
.
.
![]() .
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
As references, Wendy had a photo of a
big wave and lots of sketches and photos of seagulls. She had already prepared
pencil guidelines for the wave and a few gulls. She wet the paper, pretty thoroughly, and then started with a large patch of central yellow light, followed by green and then some violet for darker areas, all put on with flowing up-strokes. Early on, to emphasise the light in the wave she started an even darker sky background, with blue, violet and grey. |
| This background went, not very carefully, around the drawn outlines
of the birds. Even here she kept the brush moving with the same upward sweeps.
She kept going back over the same areas so that there was variation of tone and
hue everywhere. For some of the lighter areas, where it was not possible to lift out enough paint, she introduced paint mixtures including white acrylic. "Never use pure white - mix it with other colours: yellow ochre, pink, blue etc." As she put more and more detail she was repeatedly studying the photos and sketches to locate their important features. |
![]() |
![]() |
Watercolour dries lighter and so Wendy
had to keep going back in with more and more darks: burnt sienna, violet, blue
and even (hush) some black. Quite a lot of purple (and touches of lovely
aquamarine) went into the wave. The green, too, needed to be
strengthened. Colour went on very dark at the edges of the birds etc. but was feathered out into the general background. Everything was kept pretty wet, so marks that at first looked very harsh soon spread out and blended in with their surroundings. The bucking of wetted |
| Personally, I very lightly spray the back of the picture, put it face down on an absorbent surface and cover it with a weighted sheet of glass (Sam Dauncey) | |
| As the wave developed, Wendy also visited the birds more and more
frequently (it should be clear by now that she was working all over the
painting all the time) . Repeated glazing gives a painting life because it makes surfaces more varied. It was never quite clear to me how Wendy got round the problem that glazes tend to result in mud if any earlier ones are not bone dry - perhaps she moved round the picture in such a way that each area had time to dry before she re-visited it. Splatters of off-white paint give the impression of spray (brush flicked across the end of a finger). |
![]() |
![]() |
From now on we shifted into a process of repeated darkening and
highlighting. The brush nearly always moved only in the direction of the curve
of the inside of the wave. Edges were strengthened and pulled out. Areas of light along the crest of the wave and dark in the trough established a lovely curve across the top, down the right hand side and back under to the left. Then, surprise, we found that the original pencil drawing included masking fluid: in the birds and for some very fine lines in the darker part of the wave" |
| As the end of the demo approached, we
noticed how wave colours are reflected in the low-flying gulls, how wing shapes
are hinted at even away from the (fuzzy) wings themselves, how the sky colours
appear in the smoother water, how the wave crest continues far over into the
distance. Wendy made the usual comment that it was not really quite finished but I'd have been more than pleased with myself if I'd got that far. Everyone seemed to find it a most instructive as well as entertaining evening. ![]() |
|
![]()
Top of Page - Home - Programme of Events - Gallery - Contacts - FCSA Site Map